FootnoteTV, Footnote Fahrenheit, and more By Stephen Lee
   
Issues : Africa Examining today's biggest issues from a broader perspective. More info here.


Sudan and Darfur (last updated January 9, 2005) (
back to top)

U.S. officials have long been concerned about the civil war in Sudan, which has been primarily between the northern, urban region controlled by the government and the southern region which follows traditional beliefs and Christianity. U.S. officials began expressing concern specifically about the Darfur region of western Sudan in late 2003 because of fighting between rebel groups and government-supported tribal militia and concluded in September 2004 that genocide was occurring in Darfur.

U.S. Involvement in Peace Efforts

Even before Darfur, the United States had taken several actions to address Sudan's civil war, which began in the 1980s. President George W. Bush appointed former Sen. John Danforth (R-Missouri) as the U.S. envoy for peace in Sudan in Sept. 2001, and Danforth visited the region twice before issuing an April 2002 report on the outlook for peace in Sudan (on-line here.

In his report, Danforth concluded that the civil war was not winnable by either side, that both the government and the Sudanese People's Liberation Movement were serious enough about wanting peace to warrant U.S. involvement, and that while the United States could not "impose a solution on Sudan," it could be a "catalyst" for achieving peace.

Danforth also criticized the Sudanese government for targeting civilians in the Nuba Mountains region and for encouraging the continued existence of slavery in Sudan. He also recognized several issues that needed to be considered in the peace process: (1) large oil reserves that have been tapped into since a pipeline was completed in 1999 and that the SPLM believes the Sudanese government has used to fund its efforts, (2) southern Sudanese's rights of self-determination, and (3) religious conflicts between Christians and Muslims in Sudan.

At Bush's request, Danforth continued to serve as the U.S. envoy to Sudan and continued to be involved in peace talks.

In July 2002, Sudan's government and the Sudan People's Liberation Movement agreed to a framework protocol on the role of state and religion and the right of the south to self-determination. In Oct. 2002, the two parties signed a memorandum of understanding that called for an end to hostilities and for an end to restrictions on humanitarian access to parts of the country. The two parties signed a declaration in Nov. 2004 to conclude a comprehensive peace agreement within months, and they signed such an agreement on Jan. 9, 2005.

U.S. Involvement in Darfur

While peace negotiations have developed between the Sudanese government and the Sudan People's Liberation Movement (SPLM), an arguably related crisis unfolded in the Darfur region bordering Chad, a crisis that in some ways undermines the progress made on the national front.

Two rebel groups - the Sudan Liberation Movement/Army (SLM/A) and the Justice and Equality Movement (JEM) - began a rebellion in February 2003. In response, government-supported tribal militia now known as the Jingaweit proceeded to attack the region's civilian population. In November 2003, for example, Jingaweit militia conducted raids in which they burned up to 32 villages and displaced thousands. Tens of thousands of civilians have reportedly died as a result of such fighting, and more than 1.5 million persons in the region have been displaced.

In late 2003 and early 2004, the United States did condemn the Darfur situation specifically. On Dec. 16, 2003, U.S. State Dept. spokesman Richard Boucher said (statement on-line here) that the United States was "deeply concerned with the rapidly deteriorating humanitarian and security situation" in the region. Bush himself condemned the situation on Apr. 7, 2004 (statement on-line here), said that the Sudanese government must "stop local militias from committing atrocities against the local population," and said that he had conveyed his views directly to President Bashir.

On Apr. 8, 2004, the Sudan government, the SLM/A and the JEM agreed to a 45-day cease fire. U.S. State Dept. deputy spokesman Adam Ereli hailed the agreement as a "crucial first step towards ending atrocities and reversing the humanitarian crisis in Darfur" and noted that the United States had been "intensely involved" in the negotiations leading to the cease-fire and intended to stay involved. Danforth noted in his assessment weeks later of the situation (on-line here) that the "horrendous tragedy of Darfur threatens to overshadow the peace process" and that the violence there "raises serious questions about the government's commitment to abandon its practices of the past."

Violence has continued despite the cease-fire and international efforts. The African Union began deploying monitors to Darfur in the summer of 2004; the United Nations Security Council endorsed this deployment and called on further efforts by the Sudanese government with Resolution 1556, adopted July 30, 2004. There were at least 125 monitors and at least 597 troops from Rwanda and Nigeria by October 2004.

Powell, who visited Sudan in June 2004, announced on Sept. 9 (remarks on-line here) that the United States had concluded that genocide was occurring in Darfur, a position that Bush reiterated in a statement released that same day (on-line here). Powell also said that a U.S.-assembled Atrocities Documentation Team (report on-line here) had found that as of August 2004 more than 405 villages in Darfur had been completely destroyed and more than a sixth of the region's population had been displaced.

U.S. State Dept. spokesman Richard Boucher again issued a statement (on-line here) about Darfur on Dec. 20, saying that the U.S. was "gravely concerned by the intensified violence that has been taking place in Darfur in recent days."

By September 2004, the United States had provided $211 million in aid to Sudan and Chad, where many refugees had gone, including $112 million in food assistance and $6.8 million for the African Union mission.

Terrorism

Apart from the concern over the civil strife within Sudan, the United States has also long been concerned about the government of Sudan's ties to international terrorism. In the early 1990s, Sudan began imposing harsh applications of Islamic law and became a haven for terrorists; Osama bin Laden reportedly resided in Sudan during this time before leaving for Afghanistan around 1996.

The United States designated Sudan a state sponsor of terrorism in 1993, closed its embassy in Sudan in 1996, imposed sanctions on Sudan in 1997, and launched retaliatory cruise missile strikes against the capitol of Khartoum after the East Africa embassy bombings of 1998. Sudan did nonetheless provide some cooperation to the United States in the wake of the September 11, 2001 attacks, but its support has been mixed.

The United States continues to view Sudan as a state sponsor of terrorism, though not to the same degree as other countries. The State Department noted in its Patterns of Global Terrorism 2003 report (published in February 2004, on-line here) that Sudan's "cooperation and information sharing has improved marketdly, producing significant progress in combating terrorist activity, but areas of concern remain."


Rwanda (last updated February 5, 2003) (back to top)

One of the worst massacres in modern history unfolded in the central African country Rwanda in 1994, in some part due to the United States' and the international community's failure to act more quickly and decisively. About 800,000 people died from April to July 1994, the result of a planned massacre by members of the majority Hutu tribe against the Tutsi minority, as well as the resulting civil war and social upheaval.

The Clinton administration, already reeling at the time from criticism of U.S. involvement in other countries such as Somalia, resisted calling the events genocide and did not take any immediate action except to safeguard the Americans then in the country. Years later, President Bill Clinton apologized in March 1998 for his handling of the crisis, saying that "we did not do act quickly enough after the killings began. We should not have allowed the refugee camps to become safe haven for the killers. We did not immediately call these crimes by their rightful name: genocide."

Ethnic tensions had been building in Rwanda long before they culminated with the violence of the spring and summer of 1994. One of the most densely populated countries in the world, Rwanda was divided into three ethnic groups : the Hutu (85 percent), the Tutsis (14 percent), and the Twa (about 1 percent). Hutus held power since the 1960s and a Hutu, Juvenal Habyarimana, had been president since a military coup in 1973, but Tutsis who had fled decades earlier still sought to retake the country.

Fighting between Rwanda's army and the Tutsi-led Rwandese Patriotic Front (RPF) based in Uganda led to a cease-fire in 1990, and eventually to talks in 1993 that were to result in a democratically-elected government and a broad-based transitional government. The United Nations supported these efforts by sending a small peacekeeping mission of about 2,500 personnel to help the transition.

Nevertheless, these efforts ended in disaster. First, President Habyarimana and Burundi Presidnet Cyprien Ntaryamira died on April 6, 1994 when their plane crashed under mysterious circumstances. Immediately afterwards, the Hutu-led attacks against the Tutsis began. Hutus from Rwanda's armed forces and youth militias hunted down Tutsis with machetes and more advanced weapons, using the radio to coordinate their attacks and to locate Tutsis' hiding locations. Hutus also

Belgium quickly pulled its forces from the UN mission, reducing its size by more than a third. The United Nations' Security Council then decided to withdraw even more personnel from the UN mission, leaving it simply with 270 people to act as an intermediary between the warring factions and to help with humanitarian operations.

Fighting continued until July 1994, when the Tutsi-led Rwandese Patriotic Front established control over most of the country. By this time, almost half the entire country had been displaced internally; both Hutus and Tutsis had fled for neighboring countries, creating a massive refugee crisis exacerbated by violence within the camps and an outbreak of cholera.

The United Nations slowly sent forces in the summer and fall of 1994 back into Rwanda to help with humanitarian efforts, reaching full strength of about 5,500 personnel in October 1994. The United Nations also established an international tribunal to prosecute persons responsible for genocide; by 2002, more than 80 people had been indicted, and eight had been convicted, including the prime minister at the time.

Critics have long blamed the magnitude of the Rwandan genocide on the international community's failure to act more decisively. Boutros-Boutros Ghali, the Secretary General of the United Nations at the time, said in 1994 that the international community had at least acquiesced in the genocide through its inactions. In 1999, a U.N.-commissioned inquiry concluded that the international community had failed by not providing enough resources and lacking the political will to take action; Secretary General Kofi Annan, who succeeded Boutros-Ghali, acknowledged that the United Nations had failed its obligation to prevent genocide.

"All of us must bitterly regret that we did not do more to prevent it. There was a United Nations force in the country at the time, but it was neither mandated nor equipped for the forceful action which would have been needed to prevent or halt the genocide," Annan said. "On behalf of the United Nations, I acknowledge this failure and express my deep remorse."

Sources: Information about the United Nations' mission in Rwanda, including detailed background on the events of 1994, is on-line here. The International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda is on-line here. President Bill Clinton's March 1998 remarks on Rwanda were quoted in October 1998 remarks by Ambassador David J. Scheffer, on-line here. The State Department's background notes on Rwanda are on-line here. David Halberstam, War in a Time of Peace (Simon & Schuster, Touchstone edition, 2002).


Conflict Diamonds (last updated January 10, 2004) (back to top)

Since 1998, the international community has been concerned about "conflict diamonds" - diamonds sold by forces in the African countries of Sierra Leone, Angola and the Democratic Republic of Congo to fund their military operations. These concerns have resulted in changes in how many countries, including the United States, regulate the importation of diamonds.

In April 2003, President George W. Bush signed into law the Clean Diamond Trade Act, which makes illegal the importation into the United States any rough diamond that has not been certified as not being a conflict diamond. Illegally importing conflict diamonds is punishable criminally and civilly, with criminal penalties up to 10 years in jail and $50,000 fines.

"Conflict diamonds have been used by rebel groups in Africa to finance their atrocities committed on civilian populations and their insurrections against internationally recognized governments," Bush said in an April 25, 2003 statement.

More specifically, Congress found in passing the law that both rebels and state actors alike have used diamonds to fund wars in Sierra Leone, Angola and the Democratic Republic of Congo "in large part for control of diamond mining areas." Congress found that more than 3.7 million people have died and more than 6.5 million people have been driven from their homes because of such wars.

Since 1998, the United Nations, human-rights advocates and the diamond industry have been working to halt the trade of conflict diamonds. The United Nations banned illicit diamonds in 1998. Diamond-producing countries in 2000 began the Kimberly Process, a negotiation process to regulate the diamond trade that was named after the South African city where the process began. 52 nations adopted the Kimberly Process Certification scheme in November 2002, and it officially came into force on January 1, 2003.

Conflict diamonds reportedly make up about 3-4 percent of all diamonds produced. Other large diamond-producing countries that have not raised the same concerns are Botswana, South Africa, Australia, and Russia.

Sources: Information about the Clean Diamond Trade Act, Public Law No. 108-19, can be found via the Library of Congress on-line here. President George W. Bush's April 25, 2003 statement is on-line here. The Kimberly Process is on-line here. The World Diamond Council, a diamond industry organization created in 2000 amidst concerns about conflict diamonds, is on-line here.


Liberia (last updated July 27, 2003) (back to top)

A resurgence of fighting in the West African country of Liberia in 2003 has drawn international attention and new calls for President Charles Taylor to step down. United States President George Bush has called explicitly for Taylor's resignation and has said that the United States may supply military forces to a peacekeeping force if one is established by the Economic Community of West African States.

Liberia was engulfed in a civil war lasting from 1989 to 1996, and that ended only when Taylor was elected president in July 1997. Fighting resumed in 2001 and escalated in early 2003, with the rebel groups the Liberians United for Reconciliation and Development (LURD) and the Movement for Democracy in Liberia (MODEL) receiving support from Liberia's neighbors Guinea and the Ivory Coast.

The government signed a ceasefire with LURD and MODEL on June 17, 2003, but fighting continued nonetheless.

A warlord who initiated the civil war with a 1989 invasion, Charles Taylor has been widely criticized for Liberia's instability and for human rights violations including the use of child soldiers. He has also been condemned for supporting a decade-long civil war in neighboring Sierra Leone, and a special court convened to prosecute war crimes stemming from that conflict announced in June 2003 that it had indicted Taylor three months earlier. Since 2001, the United Nations has imposed sanctions against Liberia and called for restrictions on Liberian diamonds (reportedly used to fund the fighting) because of Liberia's involvement in the Sierra Leone conflict.

Taylor said in early July 2003 that he would step down from office and leave the country, but had not done so by the end of the month.

Liberia itself was founded by freed slaves from the United States in 1820. These freed slaves, called Americo-Liberians, established what is now the country's capitol city of Monrovia and named it after U.S. President James Monroe. Liberia was then ruled as a one-party state until Samuel K. Doe seized power in 1980. Civil war began in 1989 with Taylor's invasion from the Ivory Coast, and led to Doe's death in 1990. Taylor finally agreed to the formation of a transitional government in 1996, and won special election in 1997.

Sources: The State Department has information on Liberia on-line here. Human Rights Watch has a June 20, 2003 background briefing on Liberia on-line here. A UN press release dated June 5, 2003 about the extension of sanctions against Liberia is on-line here. The Special Court for Sierra Leone is on-line here.


The Democratic Republic of Congo (last updated July 27, 2003) (back to top)

Formerly known as Zaire, the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) has been wracked by a devastating civil war involving its neighbors since August 1998, but developments since late 2002 have increased hopes for an eventual peace. Nevertheless, fighting continues, especially in the Ituri area in the country's northeastern region.

About two to five million people have died because of the conflict, according to various estimates. According to a 2003 mortality study by the International Rescue Committee, the DRC's civil war resulted in at least 3.3 million deaths from August 1998 to November 2002, or more deaths than any conflict but World War II. In an April 8, 2003 press release, IRC President George Rupp called the war "a humanitarian catastrophe of horrid and shocking proportions … [T]he death toll from all the recent wars in the Balkans don't even come close. Yet, the crisis has received scant attention from international donors and the media."

The civil war grew out of major upheaval in the middle and late 1990s. President Laurent-Desire Kabila took control of the government and the capitol city of Kinshasa in 1997, but he was challenged by forces primarily in the eastern part of the country that were still loyal to Mobutu and were backed by neighboring countries Rwanda and Uganda. This conflict began in August 1998, drew in other African countries and has been called "Africa's world war" by some.

Steps towards peace have been gradual. In 1999, the DRC and its allies signed a ceasefire agreement with Rwanda and Uganda, and the United Nations then deployed a peacekeeping mission (known as MONUC) to the DRC to help monitor implementation of that agreement. In July 2002, the presidents of the DRC and of Rwanda signed the Pretoria Accord, and Rwanda accordingly withdrew its forces throughout late 2002. The DRC then signed a ceasefire agreement with the two main rebel groups on December 30, 2002.

A new transitional government was established in July 2003 with Joseph Kabila, who succeeded his father, remaining as president, and with leaders of the two main rebel groups (the Congolese Rally for Democracy (CGD) and the Congolese Liberation Movement (MLC)) serving as vice-presidents.

Background

The Democratic Republic of Congo is one of two African countries commonly known as the Congo, both named after the Congo River basin. The Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) has the second-largest land area and third-largest population of sub-Saharan Africa, with a size about that of the United States east of the Mississippi, and has seen widespread war and several changes in power since the late 1990s. By contrast, the Republic of Congo is a small nation about the size of New Mexico that had a four-month conflict in 1997 but an uneasy democracy since then.

The DRC went through many names with changes in power over the 20th century. It began the century under the control of the Belgian king and then the Belgian government, and was known as the Belgian Congo from 1907 to 1960. It was renamed the Democratic Republic of Congo when given independence in 1960, and retained that name until Joseph Mobutu (later known as Mobutu Sese Seko) took over the government, first as a military leader, and then as a self-declared president. Mobutu renamed the country Zaire in 1970 and retained power for decades.

Changes occurred in the mid- and late-1990s as the ethnic fighting in neighboring Rwanda spilled over into Zaire. One million refugees fled into Zaire in 1994, and a coalition led by Laurent-Desire Kabila began military operations to oust Mobutu in 1996. Mobutu was forced into exile in May 1997, and Kabila's forces then took the capital of Kinshasha unopposed. Kabila declared himself president and renamed the country the Democratic Republic of Congo.

That change in power and name did not end conflicts in the DRC, and war has continued to plague the country. Kabila tried expelling the Rwanda troops in August 1998, prompting army mutinies and an internal war between government troops and armed opposition, with both sides supported by different neighboring countries. DRC forces are supported by Angola, Namibia, and Zimbabwe, while opposition forces are supported by Burundi, Rwanda and Uganda. Kabila himself was assassinated in January 2001, and his son, Joseph Kabila, assumed power.

Sources: Information on the UN mission in the DRC is on-line here, including detailed background information. The International Rescue Committee is on-line here; its mortality study of the Democratic Republic of Congo was published on April 8, 2003. The United States Department of State's background notes on the Democratic Republic of Congo and on the Republic of Congo, on-line via the State Department's site here. Information also from reports by Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, and the World Bank.


AIDS in Africa (Last updated: June 2, 2001) (back to top)

Far and away, sub-Saharan Africa is suffering from AIDS more than any other region in the world.

According to the United Nations' reports as of December 2000, there are about 25.3 million adults and children living with HIV/AIDS (comprising 8.8 percent of the adult population). About 3.8 million of those living with AIDS in sub-Saharan African are newly infected in 2000, which is slightly less than the number in 1999, giving hope that the incidence of HIV is stabilizing.

HIV/AIDS is so prevalent in sub-Saharan African that it accounts for 70.1 percent of the cases worldwide; there were 36.1 million reported cases as of December 2000. By contrast, North America has 920,000 people living with HIV/AIDS, making up just 0.6 percent of the region's population and 2.5 percent of the cases worldwide. As a geographical region, only the Caribbean has HIV incidence making up more than 1% of the population; it has an adult prevalence rate of 2.3 percent.

For more on AIDS, go here.

Sources: Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS reports. Statistics from the reports on the global HIV/AIDS epidemics, June 1998, June 1999, and June 2000.

 

Index / Home
FootnoteTV
Footnote Fahrenheit
Footnote Media
Issues
Cases
Resources
Footnote Comics
Site FAQ
Search via Google

Election 2004

Issues

*Abortion
*Africa
*Affirmative Action
*AIDS
*American Identity
*Americas
*Assassinations
*Asia
*Budget
*Campaign Finance
*Challenger Remembered
*Crime
*Death Penalty
*Defense
*Drugs
*Economy
*Education
*Elections
*Energy
*Environment
*Europe
*Evolution and Anti-Evolution
*Gay and Lesbian Issues
*Guns
*Health
*Health Care
*History
*History : World War II
*International Relations
*Internet and Technology
*Iraq
*Labor
*Middle East
*Migrations
*Political Parties
*Process
*Public Arts
*Reparations
*Religion
*Science
*Sex
*Social Security
*Space
*State-Specific Issues
*Supreme Court Review
*Terrorism
 
Google
WWW Newsaic / FootnoteTV / Footnote Fahrenheit
DISCLAIMER. The materials contained in this website have been prepared by Stephen Lee ("Author") for informational purposes only and do not contain or constitute legal advice. These materials may not reflect the most current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. Furthermore, this information should in no way be taken as an indication of future results. Reading this website is not intended to create, and your receipt and/or use of the information contained herein, does not constitute an attorney/client relationship. You should not act upon this information without seeking professional counsel. Reproduction, distribution or republication of material contained within this website is prohibited unless the prior permission of Author has been obtained.

(C) Copyright 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005 Stephen Lee. All rights reserved. Newsaic and FootnoteTV are registered service marks of Stephen Lee. Mirror Law and Footnote Comics are service marks of Stephen Lee. More information available here. Comments or suggestions to the Site Editor.