By Stephen Lee
"Elevate[s] TV from mere boob tube to a source of thoughtful discussion" - Yahoo!
"Too cool" - Brad Meltzer, co-creator of Jack & Bobby
 
West Wing : Season 1 <-- Index -->

Take this Sabbath Day

Bartlet wrestles with his conscience when the Supreme Court declines to stay the first federal execution in decades (1); now he must decide to intervene or let a convicted murderer die.

(back to top)


Federal Death Penalty (last updated May 2001) (back to top)

The federal government resumed executing people in May 2001 with Timothy McVeigh, though it had been sentencing people to death since the late 1980s. The federal government had been slow in resuming use of capital punishment after it had been declared unconstitutional as then practiced in 1972; states responded more quickly and have executed hundreds.

Before McVeigh, the last time the federal government executed someone was in May 1963.

Victor H. Feguer had kidnapped and murdered a young doctor, and because he had taken his victim from Iowa into Illinois before shooting him, and because he was in Alabama when he was finally arrested by the FBI, he came under federal jurisdiction and he unwittingly earned the dubious honor of being the last defendant to be executed by the federal government in the 20th century. He was 27 years old, and he was hung at 5:30 a.m. on February 15, 1963; it took more than nine minutes for him to die.

Feguer's execution was the only federal execution of the 1960s, and it was one of only 33 since 1930. By contrast, state governments had executed more than a hundred each year over that same time period.

Nine years later, in 1972, the United States Supreme Court held that capital punishment as then conducted was "cruel and unusual punishment" and thus unconstitutional; states responded quickly to find more structured policies, while the federal government did not bother until the 1980s.

Most violent crimes are handled at the state level, by state prosecutors. However, the federalization of crime since the 1980s has expanded the number of crimes that can be prosecuted at either the state or federal levels; it has also expanded the number of federal crimes that can be punished by death.

In 1988, the Drug Kingpin Act made the death sentence available for certain drug-related offenses, re-introducing capital punishment into the federal system. United States Attorneys (the lead federal prosecutor in each federal judicial district) could ask the Attorney General (the head of the Department of Justice) for approval to seek the death penalty; any US Attorney who did not want to use the death penalty simply would not ask. From 1988 to 1994, US Attorneys sought approval 52 times and received it 47 times; 20 cases actually went to trial.

In 1994, the Federal Death Penalty Act became law, adding 40 more federal capital crimes. Another four were added with the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act in 1996.

To deal with the expanded range of capital crimes, the DOJ implemented a new "protocol" in 1995. Since then, US Attorneys must submit for review all cases where the death penalty could be sought, as well as their own recommendation as to whether it should be sought. A DOJ committee then makes a recommendation to the Attorney General, who makes the ultimate decision. From January 1995 to July 2000, US Attorneys submitted 682 cases for review, seeking authorization for the death penalty a third of time, and the Attorney General authorized the death penalty for 159 cases, 42 of which were tried by July 2000.

Of the 62 federal cases where prosecutors were authorized to seek the death penalty by July 2000, 57 were convicted of a capital offense. Of those convicted, 26 were sentenced to death; the other 31 were given other sentences. Of those 26 sentenced to death, only 19 were formally on death row as of July 2000.

Of these 19 people, 13 are black, 4 are white, 1 is Hispanic, and 1 is Asian. Six of the 19 were convicted in Texas, four in Virginia, and two in Montana.

The question of race - and to a lesser extent, geography - plays a strong role in the debate over capital punishment at the state and federal levels, or at least in its application. At the federal level, the DOJ protocol tries to eliminate racial consideration from its deliberations by barring US Attorneys from submitting any information about a defendant's race; defense counsel can and do occasionally submit such information to argue against the authorization of the death penalty. Still, critics such as Professor Rory Little have argued that race still influences the process in informal ways.

It may be worth noting this fact: of the 13 black defendants sentenced to death as of July 2000, 8 were convicted of a violent crime in which their victim was another black person.

While he did allow executions as a governor and supported capital punishment, President Bill Clinton used the question of racial disparities to delay the execution of Juan Raul Garcia, a convicted drug kingpin and three-time murderer from Texas, who was originally scheduled to be the first prisoner executed by the US government since Victor Feguer. Garcia was to be executed on August 5, 2000, but Clinton delayed the execution two times, pushing it back to June 2001.

The delay meant that Timothy McVeigh, convicted for the 168 deaths resulting from the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing, was the first prisoner executed by the US government when he was executed on May 5, 2001.

For more on the death penalty at the state and federal levels, go here.

Sources: The United States Department of Justice, The Federal Death Penalty System: A Statistical Survey (1988-2000), published September 12, 2000, available online. Rory K. Little, The Federal Death Penalty: History and some thoughts about the Department of Justice's role, Fordham Urban Law Journal, March 1999 (26 Fordham Urb. L. J. 347).



Home / Calendar


The West Wing


The Daily Show with Jon Stewart


The Colbert Report


Saturday Night Live


Commander in Chief


Law & Order

*
Issues
Resources
Site FAQ
Search via Google

Ripped from the Headlines?

West Wing: Santos discusses a lawsuit about intelligent design

West Wing: Electoral map as of the 10/9 episode; Santos needs to catch up big-time

SNL: The Miers nomination

South Park: Inspired by Katrina

Boston Legal: End to assault-weapons ban

Daily Show: A 2004 study found that 21 percent of young people regularly get their campaign news from comedy shows like the Daily Show with Jon Stewart and Saturday Night Live. So, some footnotes.

NOTE: All photos are copyright their respective owners.

Google
WWW Newsaic / FootnoteTV / Footnote Fahrenheit
DISCLAIMER. The materials contained in this website have been prepared by Stephen Lee ("Author") for informational purposes only and do not contain or constitute legal advice. These materials may not reflect the most current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. Furthermore, this information should in no way be taken as an indication of future results. Reading this website is not intended to create, and your receipt and/or use of the information contained herein, does not constitute an attorney/client relationship. You should not act upon this information without seeking professional counsel. Reproduction, distribution or republication of material contained within this website is prohibited unless the prior permission of Author has been obtained.

(C) Copyright 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005 Stephen Lee. All rights reserved. Newsaic and FootnoteTV are registered service marks of Stephen Lee. Mirror Law and Footnote Comics are service marks of Stephen Lee. More information available here. Comments or suggestions to the Site Editor.

By Stephen Lee